Skip to content
← Case studies

Multi-brand operations / shared platform

Running a multi-brand business

The implementation brief

A business representing several fashion brands needed to manage their products, sales and production together, whilst retaining visibility of each brand’s revenues, commissions and gross profits. The requirement was one operating entity with brand-level distinctions—not a separate software setup for every brand.

The implementation

Many brands. Shared functions. Distinct results.

Implementation architecture
Shared ERP · one business entityBrand ABrand BBrand CBrand DBrand EBrand FEcommerce · one website for each brandIntegration layerIntegration layerIntegration layerBrand-linked recordsSales requirementsRecord finished stock receivedStock & shipment recordsShipped + invoicedProducts + inventory toeach websiteOnline orders for ERPreportingOrders + order updatesfor fulfilmentNon-ecommerce orders forfulfilmentPhysical dispatchProducts identified by brandProduct and inventory records shared with the corresponding websiteSales orders & reporting recordsOnline orders retained for consolidated reportingProduction orders for each brandStock received from each brandShipment records & invoicesBusiness records · physical fulfilment takes place at the warehouseCommission review & commercial reportingBrand A websiteEcommerceBrand B websiteEcommerceBrand C websiteEcommerceBrand D websiteEcommerceBrand E websiteEcommerceBrand F websiteEcommerceShared Warehouse Management SystemOne warehouse · pick, pack & dispatch for every brandShipments for every brand
Module / recordConnected systemInternal workflowIntegrationPhysical movement recorded

Systems involved

ERP · Ecommerce · WMS

One shared ERP for the business

The ERP brought together product records, sales, production, stock, shipment records, invoicing and reporting across all represented brands within a single management platform, supporting teams across every business function. It also synchronised product and inventory data to each brand’s ecommerce website and received online orders back for consolidated reporting. Each record retained its brand association so commercial results could be reviewed by brand.

An ecommerce website for each brand

Every brand had its own online store. Each website received product and inventory data from the ERP and captured its own customer orders. Those orders went back to the ERP for reporting and were also sent directly to the shared WMS for fulfilment.

One shared warehouse and WMS

A warehouse is the physical location where goods are stored, picked, packed and dispatched; the WMS is the software used to manage that work. One warehouse served all the brands and carried out all shipments. Its WMS received non-ecommerce orders from the ERP and ecommerce orders directly from each brand’s website, so the warehouse could fulfil both through one system.

From shared records to physical shipments
From shared records to physical shipments. ERP to ECOMMERCE: Products + inventory. ECOMMERCE to WMS: Ecommerce orders + updates. ECOMMERCE to ERP: Online orders → consolidated reporting. ERP to WMS: Non-ecommerce orders → fulfilmentProducts + inventoryEcommerce orders + updatesOnline orders → consolidated reportingNon-ecommerce orders → fulfilmentERPShared business recordsProducts, production, stock andfinancial results, linked bybrand.ECOMMERCEEach brand sells onlineEach website receives productand inventory data and capturesits own orders.WMSOne warehouse shipsERP and ecommerce orders arrivein WMS. The warehouse picks,packs and dispatches for everybrand.
ERP

Shared business records

Products, production, stock and financial results, linked by brand.

  • ERP → ECOMMERCEProducts + inventory
  • ERP → WMSNon-ecommerce orders → fulfilment
ECOMMERCE

Each brand sells online

Each website receives product and inventory data and captures its own orders.

  • ECOMMERCE → WMSEcommerce orders + updates
  • ECOMMERCE → ERPOnline orders → consolidated reporting
WMS

One warehouse ships

ERP and ecommerce orders arrive in WMS. The warehouse picks, packs and dispatches for every brand.

    Business impact

    This tech stack gave the business the multi-brand data and reporting visibility it needed, bringing six brands together with a clear view of each brand’s operations and commercial performance.

    A consolidated view for leadership

    Leadership gained a consolidated view of products, sales, raw materials, production, stock and financial performance across six brands, with ecommerce and warehouse activity connected to the same records. This reduced back-and-forth with teams and the work of assembling reports manually, giving leaders deeper insight for strategic decisions. Consistently recorded activity also built a historical dataset, making it easier to compare performance, recognise trends and improve reporting over time.

    Connected teams within each brand

    Each brand retained its own products, orders and commercial records within the shared platform. Connected information reduced everyday manual errors and time spent re-entering data or chasing colleagues. This freed teams to analyse which products were performing well, forecast future demand and identify opportunities to reduce costs and waste.

    Less administration between the office and warehouse

    Integrations passed product and order information between the ERP, brand websites and shared WMS. Routine fulfilment handovers required fewer emails, phone calls and manual updates, giving teams more time to manage exceptions and keep the data accurate.

    Better control of costs, stock and production

    A clearer view of material requirements, production commitments, stock and sales helped teams plan purchases and production against demand. It also made avoidable costs, excess stock and potential waste easier to identify, supporting better forecasts and more informed commercial decisions.

    Elevate with AI

    Proposed additions, informed by published examples from other businesses. AI was not part of the original implementation.

    • Ask an AI assistant to audit collections, test buying assumptions and turn a merchandising instruction into a draft workflow.
    • Forecast demand for new styles using patterns from similar products, then recommend quantities by size and sales channel.
    • Learn from each shopper’s browsing and purchases to adapt product selections and introduce relevant categories automatically.

    Tools to implement

    • Shopify Sidekick + Flow

      Commercial analysis & workflow creation

      In practiceMaggy London used Sidekick to audit 199 collections, inform its seasonal buying plan and build a weekly trending-product Flow. Shopify reports weekly reporting fell from 3–4 hours to 20–30 minutes.

      Apply hereIf the stores use Shopify, use Sidekick within each brand’s admin to investigate collections and buying decisions. Ask it to draft the weekly top-20-product tagging workflow; review and activate it in Flow, which runs the automation.

      Read Maggy London case study
    • autone

      AI buying & inventory planning

      In practiceRoberto Cavalli used AI forecasts to guide collection buying and stock allocation. In autone’s published case study, the buying cycle fell from three weeks to three days.

      Apply hereConfirm connectors for the ERP, ecommerce and WMS, then map brand, product, sales and stock data. Pilot one collection: review AI recommendations for sizes and quantities, then approve purchasing decisions in the ERP.

      Read Roberto Cavalli case study
    • Nosto

      Individual product discovery

      In practiceMarc Jacobs uses Nosto to build a personalised storefront from browsing and purchase patterns, introducing handbag customers to other categories. The team tests recommendations whilst retaining control over merchandising rules.

      Apply hereFor Shopify stores, install Nosto per brand, sync the catalogue and enable behaviour tracking. Add a personalised recommendation placement, set stock and brand rules, then A/B test it against the existing experience.

      Read Marc Jacobs case study

    These are proposed applications to this case study. Platform compatibility and data access need to be confirmed; Sidekick does not automatically access ERP or WMS records.

    Anonymous case study based on real client experience

    Related case studies

    Connecting material reuse to fulfilment→Reaching new customers through a connected marketplace→